(no subject)
Aug. 8th, 2008 02:55 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
last night james and i met up for farewell dinner with
fairyphotos and her partner, who had arrived a bit before us. when the waiter brought our drinks back to the table, with great deliberation, he gave me the water with the straw in it, james the one without. for some reason, this seemed like a vaguely sexist move ("wouldn't want to mess up your lipstick"), and i said as much as he walked away; however the theory was (technically) disproven when jeremy ordered a water and it came...with a straw.
i look for this kind of stuff, though. when i eat in restaurants (specifically with men), i consider the placement of the check at the end of the meal a make-or-break moment. this is especially true of nicer restaurants. i am happiest when the check is neutrally placed in the middle of the table, evenly located between myself and the other person. in cases where the check is, well, obviously placed in front of the dude (james; a friend; whoever), that server not only guarantees i will be paying the bill, but also that i will be tipping poorly/minimally.
there was a fancy restaurant in florida (which i thankfully never patroned) where a friend of mine and her (female) partner went for dinner once. they had two menus: one for men (with the prices), and one for women (without the prices, so they could, i guess, order whatever they wanted?). i suppose the establishment was only prepared for that binary prospect, and none others, because both my friend and her partner received the price-less menu, and were refused when they asked to see a menu with prices on it. ridiculous.
i've never worked in the service industry, so i don't know what philosophy goes behind these kinds situations. is it just legacy issues--policies or practices that haven't changed in god-knows how long? are people aware? are servers actually instructed to "slide the check to the male party, when a party of two is male and female," or is that server just making a judgement call on who's got the money, or based in their own politics?
the check thing really is one of my largest pet-peeves in eating out. like to the degree of making me sick to my stomach when it happens (especially when, in +50% of the cases, i am paying for the meal.)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
i look for this kind of stuff, though. when i eat in restaurants (specifically with men), i consider the placement of the check at the end of the meal a make-or-break moment. this is especially true of nicer restaurants. i am happiest when the check is neutrally placed in the middle of the table, evenly located between myself and the other person. in cases where the check is, well, obviously placed in front of the dude (james; a friend; whoever), that server not only guarantees i will be paying the bill, but also that i will be tipping poorly/minimally.
there was a fancy restaurant in florida (which i thankfully never patroned) where a friend of mine and her (female) partner went for dinner once. they had two menus: one for men (with the prices), and one for women (without the prices, so they could, i guess, order whatever they wanted?). i suppose the establishment was only prepared for that binary prospect, and none others, because both my friend and her partner received the price-less menu, and were refused when they asked to see a menu with prices on it. ridiculous.
i've never worked in the service industry, so i don't know what philosophy goes behind these kinds situations. is it just legacy issues--policies or practices that haven't changed in god-knows how long? are people aware? are servers actually instructed to "slide the check to the male party, when a party of two is male and female," or is that server just making a judgement call on who's got the money, or based in their own politics?
the check thing really is one of my largest pet-peeves in eating out. like to the degree of making me sick to my stomach when it happens (especially when, in +50% of the cases, i am paying for the meal.)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-08 10:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-08 10:51 pm (UTC)The restaurant you spoke about in FL would absolutely disgust me! I would definitely have caused a scene.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-08 11:20 pm (UTC)I think the menu thing would *never* happen in a metropolitan area in the west coast.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 01:58 am (UTC)'i look for this kind of stuff, though.'
yeah, this happens to me too- once you start learning about the mysterious ways of the patriarchy, you start seeing it everywhere (for me it's both feminist and speciesist stuff)...probably because it really is everywhere.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 12:41 pm (UTC)Honestly, the check thing does bother me(although it is getting better with time) - but the way I deal with it now is, if I intend to pay - I SIGNAL to the server to give me the check. It's pretty easy and they get the message. If you want to change things...you have to ACT. If they are still being dicks, then the tip is affected. How do you know if the server is a) dealing with a restaurant policy that they have no control over and you are hurting them directly, b) your table might just be arranged that the empty space is not in front of you, c) they are just doing their job - they don't see you as male-female, and they are simply putting down the check. How do you know?
no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 08:24 pm (UTC)Pretty sure it's determined by the server's attitude as I've never noticed any restaurants which will always do this - even the family-owned hole in the wall Indian restaurants tend to do the middle of the table thing, even though first/second generation Indians come from a very conservative country.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 09:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-10 06:40 pm (UTC)generally though, i dont think waiters give it a lot of thought. probably has more to do with open space on the table than sexism. what i really want to know is why only one of your drinks came with a straw? ;-)